[Ucrfacultyandstaff] Vice Chancellor Rodolfo Torres Senior Leadership Development Assessment

[Chancellor]

Dear Colleagues,

Pursuant to Regents Policy 7702 ‒ Performance Management Review Process<http://policy.ucop.edu/manuals/smg-hr-policies.html>, a senior leadership development assessment of all Senior Management Group (SMG) members is required every five years. I am writing to review the accomplishments of Rodolfo Torres, who has served as Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic Development since 2019. You may view more information about the process, as well as his self-assessment materials, at https://chancellor.ucr.edu/senior-leadership-development-assessments.

I would appreciate your thoughts and comments via this confidential online form<https://ucriverside.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4VnFVVfN32O7rBs>. Please comment specifically on Vice Chancellor Torres’ leadership, vision, and skills, either internally to his unit and/or as a campus senior administrator. This can include strengths and areas for development, as well as any specific challenges you observe his areas of responsibility facing in the coming years and your advice on confronting these challenges and providing leadership in the future. Your response will be shared with the confidential review committee, and be held in strict confidence, in conformity with the Senior Leadership Development Assessment Procedures<https://documents.ucr.edu/HR-Resources/pm-5-year-review-procedures.pdf>.

This is also an important time to remind the campus community of the regular avenues to report concerns or to provide feedback, including the annual review process and https://help.ucr.edu/.

If you have any questions about this request, please contact Beth Claassen Thrush at smg_review at ucr.edu<mailto:smg_review at ucr.edu>. I hope to receive your response by November 22. Thank you for your participation.

Sincerely,



Kim A. Wilcox, Chancellor

Confidentiality of Evaluative Responses

Contributors are highly encouraged to provide their name and institutional affiliation with the feedback to provide context, and the University of California will strive to keep your name and institutional affiliation confidential to the extent permitted by university policy and/or applicable state and federal law. In order to keep their identity confidential, contributors may want to avoid putting information in the body of their responses that would identify them.

If contributors choose to remain anonymous when providing feedback, it may not be possible to follow up or take action on specific concerns. Anonymous responses will be shared with the supervisor, but not the review committee.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://scotmail.ucr.edu/pipermail/ucrfacultyandstaff/attachments/20241107/f3644f49/attachment.html>