[Ucrfacultyandstaff] Senior Leadership Development Assessment

UCR Chancellor chancellor at ucr.edu
Wed Oct 21 15:01:00 PDT 2026


Dear Colleagues,

Pursuant to Regents Policy 7702 ‒ Performance Management Review Process
<http://policy.ucop.edu/manuals/smg-hr-policies.html>, a senior leadership
development assessment of all Senior Management Group (SMG) members is
required every five years. I am writing to review the accomplishments of
Mariam Lam, who has served as Vice Chancellor and Chief Diversity Officer
since 2016. This assessment covers the period from 2021-2026.

I would appreciate your thoughts and comments via this confidential online
form <https://ucriverside.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_dcoKTPFECtKxPlc>.
Please comment specifically on Vice Chancellor Lam’s leadership, vision,
and skills. This can include strengths and areas for development, as well
as any specific challenges you observe in her areas of responsibility and
your advice on confronting these challenges and providing leadership in the
future. Your response will be shared with the confidential review
committee, and be held in strict confidence.

For further information on the criteria for evaluation for this assessment
and materials related to this position, I encourage you to review the Senior
Leadership Development Assessment Site
<https://chancellor.ucr.edu/senior-leadership-development-assessments>,
including the self-assessment, job description and org chart. This is also
an important time to remind the campus community of the regular avenues to
provide feedback, including the annual review process and the campus hub to
assist with reporting concerns <https://help.ucr.edu>.

If you have any questions about this request, please contact Associate
Chancellor Michael Richards at michael.richards at ucr.edu. I hope to receive
your response by November 16. Thank you for your participation.



Sincerely,



S. Jack Hu, Chancellor



Confidentiality of Evaluative Responses

Contributors are highly encouraged to provide their name and institutional
affiliation with the feedback to provide context. If the name is provided,
it will only be visible to the Chancellor. The University of California
will strive to keep your name and institutional affiliation confidential to
the extent permitted by university policy and/or applicable state and
federal law. In order to keep their identity confidential, contributors may
want to avoid putting information in the body of their responses that would
identify them.

If contributors choose to remain anonymous when providing feedback, it may
not be possible to follow up or take action on specific concerns. Anonymous
responses will be shared with the Chancellor, but not the review committee.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://scotmail.ucr.edu/pipermail/ucrfacultyandstaff/attachments/20261021/11583632/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ucrfacultyandstaff mailing list