[Students] Vice Chancellor Brian Haynes Senior Leadership Development Assessment

[Chancellor]

Dear Colleagues,



Pursuant to Regents Policy 7702 ‒ Performance Management Review Process<http://policy.ucop.edu/manuals/smg-hr-policies.html>, a senior leadership development assessment of all Senior Management Group (SMG) members is required every five years. I am writing to review the accomplishments of Brian Haynes, who has served as Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs since 2018.



I would appreciate your thoughts and comments via this confidential online form<https://ucriverside.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4Hpv2LY77OME1z8>. Please comment specifically on Vice Chancellor Haynes’ leadership, vision, and skills, either internally to his unit and/or as a campus senior administrator. This can include strengths and areas for development, as well as any specific challenges you observe his areas of responsibility facing in the coming years and your advice on confronting these challenges and providing leadership in the future. Your response will be shared with the confidential review committee, and be held in strict confidence, in conformity with the Senior Leadership Development Assessment Procedures<https://hr.ucr.edu/document/five-year-senior-leadership-development-assessment-smg-administrative-guidelines>.



For further information on the criteria for evaluation for this assessment, I encourage you to review the brief document available here: https://hr.ucr.edu/document/five-year-senior-leadership-development-assessment-smg-administrative-guidelines. This is also an important time to remind the campus community of the regular avenues to report concerns or to provide feedback, including the annual review process and https://help.ucr.edu/.



If you have any questions about this request, please contact Beth Claassen Thrush at smg_review at ucr.edu<mailto:smg_review at ucr.edu>. I hope to receive your response by November 17. Thank you for your participation.

Sincerely,

[cid:image001.png at 01DA0D6A.58B40C20]

Kim A. Wilcox

Chancellor

[cid:image002.png at 01DA0D6A.58B40C20]





Confidentiality of Evaluative Responses

Contributors are highly encouraged to provide their name and institutional affiliation with the feedback to provide context, and the University of California will strive to keep your name and institutional affiliation confidential to the extent permitted by university policy and/or applicable state and federal law. In order to keep their identity confidential, contributors may want to avoid putting information in the body of their responses that would identify them.

If contributors choose to remain anonymous when providing feedback, it may not be possible to follow up or take action on specific concerns. Anonymous responses will be shared with the supervisor, but not the review committee.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://scotmail.ucr.edu/pipermail/students/attachments/20231102/9a35e823/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4604 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://scotmail.ucr.edu/pipermail/students/attachments/20231102/9a35e823/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13511 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://scotmail.ucr.edu/pipermail/students/attachments/20231102/9a35e823/attachment-0003.png>